Did the beloved Tennessee Goo Goo Cany Maker Fale to pay its Employees for Overtime?

May 22, 2013 by Jim Higgins

Growing up in Nashville, Tennessee you can't help be a fan of the Goo Goo Clusters. However, as a member of a Tennessee Overtime Pay and Employment Law Firm I am greatly disappointed in my beloved candy making company if a recently filed wage theft lawsuit turns out to be true. The lawsuit filed says that the Nashville based Standard Candy Company failed to pay the employees for time the were required to spend preparing for work. Specifically, it is believed that the company did not pay for the time it took their employees to pus on their gear like uniforms, boots, and other safety equipment. In the labor law world these cases are technically known as "Donning and Doffing" cases. Donning and Doffing refers to the action of putting on or taking off protective gear, uniforms, etc

Okay, so what it is the big deal? It may just take a few minutes to put on the gear. What is that, a few dollars per day? Well here is the big deal. If a company that has hundreds or thousands of employees does this the nominal amount of wage theft from each employee can equal thousands or even millions of dollars. It is a way for companies to maximum their profits not by selling a better product but by taking advantage of its employees.

The courts have made varying rulings on whether the employee should be paid for the time of putting on their gear. The first examination is whether the employee is putting on "clothing" or is it "protective gear" . If the Court determines it to be clothes then the Fair Labor Standards Act is clear that employee do not get paid of that time. However, if it is safety gear then the employees may get paid. If it is safety gear the court will then look to see whether the time required to put on the gear is significant or does it take so little time it is not worth getting paid for. Often this comes down to experts that will recreate the time it takes to put on all of the equipment.

So it will be interesting to see how this particular Tennessee Overtime Lawsuit will develop against The Standard Candy Company. What type of gear were these employees putting on? How long did it take them? How many employees are involved? These cases can take years to resolve but regardless we hope that it results in a better working environment of all employees.

These types of cases make every employer examine their policies and procedures. Would it really be asking too much to allow your employees to clock in and then to put on their safety gear? Every penny counts to the working men and women of our state. What would these companies do if an employee asked them to pay for time while they were with their family? Obviously, the would think the employee is crazy. So why isn't it just as crazy for the employer to require the employee to be at work and to change into their work gear for free?

Continue reading "Did the beloved Tennessee Goo Goo Cany Maker Fale to pay its Employees for Overtime?" »

Can Restaurants Use Tip Credit Wages for Non-Tipped Work?

May 16, 2013 by Jim Higgins

If you have ever waited tables then you know, that the Fair Labors Standards Act(FLSA) allows an employer to pay an employee a lower hourly rate if they receive enough tips to put them over the minimum wage amount. This can work great for both the employer and the employee if it is a restaurant/bar with good tippers. However, we have handled numerous cases over the past years where greedy employer try to skirt the law to make it even better for them. Some of the most common tip pool violations we see are:

1. Making the employee share their tips with managment and traditionally non-tipped employees

2. Employee does not make enough tips to reach an average of minimum wage

3. Paying the server the tip wage for non-tipped work. (ex. you have to clean the restaurant after close).

4. Not paying more for overtime work.

Continue reading "Can Restaurants Use Tip Credit Wages for Non-Tipped Work?" »

'Price Is Right' Model's Pregnancy Lawsuit Verdict Overturned

May 2, 2013 by Nicole Barto

Pregnant employees in Tennessee and all over the United States should not be discriminated against in the workplace, according to The Pregnancy Discrimination Act. Under this act, employers are forbidden from discrimination when hiring, terminating, paying, laying off, and giving promotions or benefits to someone because they are pregnant. Unfortunately, this kind of discrimination occurs all too often in the workplace to pregnant women. If you or someone you know has faced this or any other kind of workplace discrimination, it is recommended that you talk to a Tennessee employment discrimination attorney right away. They will help you to determine what kind of compensation you may be eligible to receive for your discrimination claim.

According to this lawsuit, model Brandi Cochran, who was a "Price Is Right" model for eight years, claims that she was discriminated against because she was pregnant. According to her claim, she states, after she got pregnant in 2007 that show producers treated her differently and started to give her less work before she was eventually terminated. Cochran says that this caused stress to her and her baby.

The show's producers argued that Cochran failed to produce any evidence proving that they didn't rehire her because of her pregnancy. In addition, the producers say they cannot be liable for discriminating against the model for her pregnancy-related depression, as they had no knowledge of the condition. However, prior to the jury deliberating the case, the judge apparently failed to instruct the jury on the necessary elements to find the producers liable.
According to the law, Cochran's "Price Is Right" lawsuit was a "mixed motive" discrimination case, meaning her termination arguably may have been based on both discriminatory and nondiscriminatory reasons. In such a case, the judge is required to instruct jurors that the employer is only liable if the discrimination is a "substantial motivating reason" for the termination, and not just a "motivating reason." The judge felt that the jury had received bad jury instructions and ordered a new trial, overturning the $7.7 million jury award for model Brandi Cochran.

Continue reading "'Price Is Right' Model's Pregnancy Lawsuit Verdict Overturned" »

Police officers claim checking emails outside of work should be compensated as overtime

April 19, 2013 by Nicole Barto

Tennessee employees as well as employees all across the country are entitled to receive overtime pay for any hours worked over forty in a single work week. A company or local office might get away with not paying overtime by making their employees perform work related tasks while they are off the clock. This is made even easier for companies to do because of technological advances such as the internet and using cell phones. However, even if tasks such as checking e-mail or using a cell phone are done after hours by employees, if the work is related to their job, then under the Fair Labor Standards Act, they may be entitled to receive overtime pay.

In this case, Police Department Sergeant Jeffrey Allen originally filed his suit, alleging overtime compensation violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act in 2010. On January 14, 2013, U.S. Magistrate Judge Sidney Schenkier granted Allen’s conditional certification for a collective action under the FLSA. In his suit, Allen claims that the city violated the FLSA when it failed to compensate him, an hourly non-exempt employee, and a putative class of police officers for time spent reading and responding to emails via city-issued BlackBerries outside of normal working hours.

According to his claim, Allen’s proposed group of plaintiffs for the collective action included “All Police Department members . . . who worked ‘off the clock’ using Police Department issued PDA’s or other electronic communication devices without receiving compensation for each hour worked . . . .” Allen alleged that he and roughly 200 other officers in the Police Department’s Bureau of Organized Crime were required to use their police department issued devices to perform work outside of normal business hours and were then pressured into not reporting the overtime worked. The city responded by stating that it had in place procedures for reporting overtime and that the plaintiff failed to take advantage of them.

Allen claimed that, the bureau had an “unwritten” rule which held that officers who wanted a promotion were expected not to report overtime for hours spent responding to emails and calls while they were off-duty. Having obtained conditional certification, Allen now must notify other potential plaintiffs of the suit, who then have until April 8 to opt in. Following the April 8 deadline, the court will hold a status hearing and proceed with the case.

To determine that Allen had made a modest factual showing that he and other officers were subjected to an unwritten policy of not being paid for the off-duty use of their Blackberries, the court focused on the depositions of eight Chicago Police Department officers. These depositions, the court said, indicated that “Sergeants and Lieutenants in the Bureau of Organized Crime believed that they were expected to check and possibly respond to emails and calls made to their department-issued BlackBerries while they were off-duty without being compensated for these activities.”

Continue reading "Police officers claim checking emails outside of work should be compensated as overtime" »

Newspaper Settles Overtime Pay Lawsuit with Reporters

March 30, 2013 by Nicole Barto

In Tennessee and all across the United States employees are entitled by law to receive overtime pay if they work more than forty hours in a single work week. Unfortunately, many companies and businesses find ways around this law or just fail to pay their employees overtime pay altogether. If you or someone you work with has worked overtime hours but not received your overtime pay, then you should speak to a Tennessee employment overtime pay lawyer right away. They will hear your case and make sure you get the compensation you deserve. Reducing employees wages is one easiest ways for a corporation to increase its profits. However, this type of behavior is nothing more than stealing wages from hard working people that have earned the money by giving a fairs days work to their boss. However, one intersting thing about these case is they are not limited to factory workers or other standard types of employment. In fact, in a recently filed case a group of news paper reporters file a lawsuit claiming they are owed wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act for overtime work they provided.

This lawsuit claims that over the past four years reporters, who worked for local paper’s suburban edition, weren’t paid for their overtime hours, and ultimately the paper decided to settle and pay $660,000. The forty-six employees will split $425,000, while the rest will go to lawyers and Carolyn Rusin, the reporter who first brought the suit, according to the report.

According to the report about the settlement, the newspaper reported that Rusin and the other reporters were not exempt from overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act because their work, primarily covering local government and school board meetings, was determined to not involve “invention, imagination and talent”. Therefore, a person doing that job could not be considered a “creative professional” and so should have been paid 1.5 times her hourly wage for every hour over forty hours per week.

It is true that not every employee is entitled to overtime pay for working more than forty (40) hours per week. However, it is also true that the standards do apply to a majority of the workers in Tennessee and throughout the country. According to the Department of Labor the FLSA applies to over 130 million workers across the nation. This includes full time and part time workers in both the private and public sector. If the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) does apply to you and you have been denied overtime pay you may be entitled to back pay, double damages and attorney's fees. The act also protects you from being terminated for standing up for your rights under the FLSA. These protections are needed as even though the employee is asking nothing more than to be treated fairly under the law many unscrupulous employers will try to punish the employee. As such, before if you believe you are being denied overtime pay feel free to contact our office so we can discuss the best way to stand up for your rights and protect your employment.

If you or someone you work with has worked overtime hours but not received your overtime pay, then you should speak to a Tennessee employment overtime pay lawyer right away. They will hear your case and make sure you get the compensation you deserve.


Continue reading "Newspaper Settles Overtime Pay Lawsuit with Reporters" »

City Electrical Department Lineman Gets $160,000 Settlement for Federal Discrimination and Retaliation Lawsuit

March 26, 2013 by Nicole Barto

In Tennessee as well as across the United States it is against the law to discriminate against an employee or potential employee because of age, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. Unfortunately however, many companies and businesses find ways around these laws and discriminate against these employees anyway. According to a recent Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) employment law case, Windell Rutherford started work with the city in 1998 and was promoted to lead lineman in 2002. He became disabled after an on-the job injury in June 2006. In December of 2006, Rutherford was told to return to work, but the city refused to return him to his job as lead lineman when he asked for accommodations that would have allowed him to do the job.

Rutherford claims that the electrical superintendant stated twice that he didn’t want him in his department. Once, he said it was because of Rutherford’s injury and disability. A second time he said it was because “all linemen are white.” Rutherford is black.

At First Rutherford was placed in a light duty position in the Public Works Department without a pay cut. He claims that e Public Works director and city administrator tried to force him to sign a form in April 2010 saying he would accept a demotion to Public Works clerk and a pay cut of more than fifty percent. The city had allowed a white lineman to stay on the job with medical restrictions. Rutherford accepted the demotion in lieu of being fired. He applied for a transfer to an open lineman position later that year, but the job was given to two less qualified, non-disabled white men, Rutherford alleged.

In May 2012, raises were proposed for Rutherford and three other employees. His raise was not approved because he had filed a discrimination complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, according to the lawsuit. Rutherford sought to be reinstated to his lead lineman job and $22.50-per-hour salary or damages for future lost wages and benefits. He also sought other monetary damages.The city electrical department and Rutherford settled the case March 5, according to court records. Rutherford will be placed in an inventory clerk position. He will be reimbursed for his portion of mediation expenses, in addition to the $160,000.

Continue reading "City Electrical Department Lineman Gets $160,000 Settlement for Federal Discrimination and Retaliation Lawsuit" »

Assistant branch managers seek overtime pay

March 22, 2013 by Nicole Barto

In Tennessee and all across the United States employees are entitled by law to receive overtime pay if they work more than forty hours in a single work week. In a recently filed case, assistant branch managers for the Citizens Financial Group claim that they were misclassified under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and were denied overtime pay. The law requires that hourly workers must be paid overtime if they work more than forty hours a week, salaried workers are exempt. According to court reports, Citizens Financial has denied the basic claim of worker misclassification and contended that the plaintiffs' situations are different enough that they shouldn't be allowed to pursue the case as a group. It cited "widely disparate employment circumstances" among the plaintiffs, who have worked at hundreds of different Citizens Financial branches throughout the East Coast.

The workers' case turns on the assistant bank managers' job duties and whether they assumed managerial duties as the bank contends, or whether they consistently performed the uniform work of lower-level employees, such as opening customer bank accounts and handling customer service, which would mean they were entitled to overtime pay. If the case doesn't settle and a jury determines that the workers acted as managers, they would be exempt from the FLSA and they would not be entitled to overtime. If, however, the jury sides with the plaintiffs, they could be entitled to as much as $14.4 million in damages. The bank has declined to discuss a settlement.

Unfortunately, many companies and businesses find ways around this law or just fail to pay their employees overtime pay altogether. If you or someone you work with has worked overtime hours but not received your overtime pay, then you should speak to a Tennessee employment overtime pay lawyer right away. They will hear your case and make sure you get the compensation you deserve.

Continue reading "Assistant branch managers seek overtime pay" »

First ADA ATM accessibility class action lawsuit is filed

March 14, 2013 by Nicole Barto

In Tennessee and all across the country, it is against the law to discriminate against an employee or customer on the basis of gender, race, disability, or sexual orientation. Unfortunately, however, our Tennessee Employment ADA and Discrimination Lawyers regularly find that companies to do just that either by not providing proper accommodations, pay, or fair treatment for each of their employees.

According to this class-action lawsuit, blind individuals claim that they were denied services by certain banks as the result of ATMs that are not accessible to the visually impaired. One of the plaintiffs, Robert Jahoda, has now filed 35 ADA ATM lawsuits in federal district court. All the claims quote a March 2012 Wall Street Journal article that states that nearly 50 percent of the more than 400,000 ATMs in the United States are inaccessible to the visually impaired, despite the fact that new standards pertaining to accessibility to ATMs for the visually impaired took effect on March 15, 2011, and all ATMs were required to be upgraded to meet these new requirements by March 15, 2012.

Some of the ADA ATM requirements include but are not limited to: machines shall be speech enabled, speech shall be delivered through a mechanism that is readily available to all users, including but not limited to, an industry standard connector or a telephone handset. Speech shall be recorded or digitized human, or synthesized. The requirements for input controls include: at least one tactilely discernible input control shall be provided for each function. Where provided, key surfaces not on active areas of display screens shall be raised above surrounding surfaces.

The requirements for numeric keypads and display screens include: numeric keys shall be arranged in a 12-key ascending or descending telephone keypad layout. The number five key shall be tactilely distinct from the other keys. The display screen shall be visible from a point located forty inches above the center of the clear floor space in front of the machine. Characters displayed on the screen shall be in a sans serif font. Characters shall be 3/16 inches high minimum, based on the uppercase letter "I." Characters shall contrast with their background with either light characters on a dark background or dark characters on a light background. Finally, Braille instructions for initiating the speech mode shall be provided.

Continue reading "First ADA ATM accessibility class action lawsuit is filed" »

Lawsuit Claims Nashville Hotel Employees were Underpaid and Denied Overtime Pay

March 5, 2013 by Nicole Barto

I don't know why but there seems we have a disturbing amount of cases where Hotels refuse to pay overtime to employees. We filed a lawsuit against one hotel last month for FLSA violations and are preparing a new one now. Apparently, other Tennessee Overtime Lawyers are seeing same problems. If you or someone you work with has worked overtime hours but not received your overtime pay, then you should speak to a Tennessee employment overtime pay lawyer right away.

According to this case, the hotels, the Best Western Music Row on Division and the Comfort Inn Downtown on Demonbreun, paid housekeepers as little as $3.50 an hour and made them work up to 70 hours a week without breaks. Rajesh Aggarwal, the franchise owner of both hotels stated that, “I’m certain that’s untrue,” when asked about the claims. According to the lawsuit, many of the hotel housekeepers are Hispanic single women and were paid a flat rate between $650 and $676 every 15 days, and the workers were sometimes given just one day off per week. Also, working fourteen hours a day was common. The lawsuit alleges several violations of the Federal Labor Standards Act.
Greg Adkins, president of the Tennessee Hospitality Association, said lawsuits brought against hotels are sometimes filed by “disgruntled employees,” adding that just because allegations have been made does not mean there was any wrongdoing. He also stated that,”Our hoteliers strive to abide by all state and federal laws.”
According to the U.S. Department of Labor, in 2011 it was discovered that there were widespread wage pay abuse among the hotel and motel industry in Tennessee. Federal officials discovered thirty-four hotels across the state, which were fined a total of $14,552 in civil penalties and required to pay out more than $170,000 in back wages for labor violations.
According to the Tennessee Department of Labor, there are nearly 20,000 employed in cleaning and maintenance jobs statewide. , Housekeepers in Tennessee total more than 8,000, and are paid around $9.86 an hour on average. The employees involved in the lawsuit were however, paid between $3.50 and seven dollars an hour. The federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour.
The lawsuit includes four employees but housekeepers who worked for either of the two hotels in the past three years can join the lawsuit. The lawsuit is seeking class-action status.
Aggarwal, according to the lawsuit, hired Hernandez last summer to work as a house cleaner at the Best Western on Music Row, working 11-hour shifts six days a week.
The suit states that Hernandez, like the other employees, was never required to record his workday hours. Instead, he was paid $50 a day regardless of how many hours he worked.

Continue reading "Lawsuit Claims Nashville Hotel Employees were Underpaid and Denied Overtime Pay" »

Five Guys Burgers Assistant Managers File Alleged Unpaid Overtime Class Action Lawsuit

February 28, 2013 by Nicole Barto

In Tennessee and all across the United States employees are entitled by law to receive overtime pay if they work more than forty hours in a single work week. As a Tennessee Overtime Pay Lawyer one of the most common overtime violations we see arises when a business calls and employee an "assistant manager" so they don't have to pay overtime.

According to this class action lawsuit filed against the Five Guys Burger Restaurant,
the Five Guys Assistant Managers claim that salaried Assistant Managers employed at Five Guys' restaurants were improperly classified as exempt from overtime wage laws. The complaint claims that the Assistant Managers spent the majority of their time taking orders, conducting prep work, including cutting lettuce, onions, and potatoes, as well as taking inventory and receiving product shipments. The complaint states, these employees "were 'managers' in name only because they did not have managerial duties or authority and should therefore have been properly classified as non-exempt employees."

The lawsuit stated that, “If Managers and Assistant managers are misclassified as exempt, they may be owed overtime back pay," according to the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Continue reading "Five Guys Burgers Assistant Managers File Alleged Unpaid Overtime Class Action Lawsuit " »

The Tennessee Legislature is moving rapidly to take away injured worker's rights

February 22, 2013 by Jim Higgins

The Tennessee Legislature is quickly moving to remove benefits from injured Tennessee Workers. It appears that the legislature is moving so anxious to make changes to the Tennessee Workers Compensation Act they are failing to consider the ramifications of the act on the employees that need its protections.

You can watch an interview about the new changes below:

Continue reading "The Tennessee Legislature is moving rapidly to take away injured worker's rights" »

Protect Tennessee Workers

February 16, 2013 by Jim Higgins

The Tennessee Legislature is in the process of stripping the right of our injured workers. By reducing the already modest benefits an injured worker recieves big business and the insurance companies will be able to greatly increase their profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit in this Country unless it is made at the tragic expense of others. That is what this bill will do and in turn many disabled workers will be supported by the taxpayers.

You can see a quick video about the law below and find out more at ProtectTNWorkers.org.

Continue reading "Protect Tennessee Workers" »